[MD] Re Ian, artikel

[Ian Glendinning]

Adrie,
The lack of evidence was not really a criticism, just an observation.
A paper like this for lay understanding must almost always be
rhetoric.
(But I have researched these two guys web sites the last day or two -
and asked a couple of physics friends - interesting.)
Ian

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Fam. Kintziger-Karaca
<kintziger_karaca at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, Ian
>
> Wel regarding this artikel, one of your questions kept coming back at me.
>
> the question about leaving the evidence out , in the artikel.
> The reason for this lays in the difference between theoretical physiks and Hypothetikal physiks.
> the difference of course is huge, theoretical physiks is exact science, hypothetikal is not.
> but hypothetical always preceides theoretikal, so the value is enourmous.
>
> Been thinking about your objections towards colliders etc..., strange.
> If you like to interact on this matter , feel free to do so.
>
> Greetzz, Adrie
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>