[MD] Valuing Bodvar's SIM (BSIM)
Andy Skelton
skeltoac at gmail.com
Wed Jul 14 09:31:13 PDT 2010
Bo, I am a blind man groping at a leathery part of a huge thing that
stomps and trumpets.
Bo to Andy:
> IMO the MOQ IS the strong interpretation, the weak one is lame, tame
> and good for nothing.. And all is about the intellectual level: The "weak
> interpretation" (WIM) says it corresponds to the mental compartment
> (that SOM calls) "mind", while the "strong interpretation" (SIM) says it
> corresponds to the former SOM (i.e SOM stripped of the "M") so you
> will see that the WIM postulates a smooth transition from SOM - an
> expansion of rationality - while the SIM postulates a total break with
> SOM - and expansion of reality.
I am trying to understand I and believe you possess clear thoughts but
frankly I find your writing style to be nearly impenetrable. So please
be patient and answer my questions so that I can know the elephant
you're riding.
> Simply said the SOL says that the subject/object metaphysics is MOQ’s intellectual level. This in contrast to the standard interpretation of SOM as one among countless intellectual patterns.
So this is your dichotomy:
WIM (SOM): Level 4 includes the subject/object distinction
SIM (SOL): Level 4 is precisely the subject/object distinction
I am trying to understand what problem this solves. I'm confused by
the history back to SOLAQI and what went before. Do I need to finish
Lila and LC before this is possible? Can anyone else jump in and
explain it in clearer English than Bo's?
Your ignorant newbie,
Andy
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list