[MD] The strong interpretation of the MOQ (SIM)

Arlo Bensinger ajb102 at psu.edu
Fri Jul 16 05:39:39 PDT 2010


[Bo]
The "THE" issue is artificial, we all know that it is our respective 
opinions we express, but can't put IMOs and IMHOs in front of - or 
after - each sentence.

[Arlo]
In addition to my previous comment on this, I want to something.

The problem is that while you say this here, you have long been 
claiming it is PIRSIG'S opinion you are expressing. At least here 
you, thankfully, admit it is not. I hope you stick with this, its a 
big revelation.

And see, when YOU say "THE metaphysics of Quality holds intellect to 
SOM" and Pirsig says "there is nothing in THE metaphysics of Quality 
that I know of that would lead to this conclusion" (paraphrased), do 
you really not see the objectification caused by the "THE" here? The 
"argument" is trapped in what "THE metaphysics of Quality says", 
which we know says nothing at all, its just you and Pirsig with 
different ideas.

This may be beating a dead horse to everyone else, but I am sure 
hoping you will one day understand this, Bo.




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list