[MD] The strong interpretation of the MOQ (SIM)
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Fri Jul 16 05:39:39 PDT 2010
[Bo]
The "THE" issue is artificial, we all know that it is our respective
opinions we express, but can't put IMOs and IMHOs in front of - or
after - each sentence.
[Arlo]
In addition to my previous comment on this, I want to something.
The problem is that while you say this here, you have long been
claiming it is PIRSIG'S opinion you are expressing. At least here
you, thankfully, admit it is not. I hope you stick with this, its a
big revelation.
And see, when YOU say "THE metaphysics of Quality holds intellect to
SOM" and Pirsig says "there is nothing in THE metaphysics of Quality
that I know of that would lead to this conclusion" (paraphrased), do
you really not see the objectification caused by the "THE" here? The
"argument" is trapped in what "THE metaphysics of Quality says",
which we know says nothing at all, its just you and Pirsig with
different ideas.
This may be beating a dead horse to everyone else, but I am sure
hoping you will one day understand this, Bo.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list