[MD] Babylonian intellectuals

david buchanan dmbuchanan at hotmail.com
Sun Jul 18 11:49:46 PDT 2010


Bo said to dmb:
Spot on Dave and thanks for not letting the "debunk Bo" urge get the best of you. I admire you for that.

dmb says:
Thanks Bo, but I certainly had no intention of defending your position. As far as I'm concerned it has already been thoroughly debunked and the those who think otherwise simply do not comprehend what SOM of the MOQ is, especially you and Platt. 


Bo said to dmb:
Symbols (vs what is symbolized) and abstractions (vs concrete) are part of intellect's S/O.



dmb says:

This is a misconception and it is just one of many examples. In the MOQ, the difference between abstractions and concrete reality is the difference between static intellectual patterns and direct everyday experience. It's the difference between sq and DQ. You are simply misconstruing the MOQ as SOM.

I really, really hate what you're doing to this place, clogging it up with this hair-brained nonsense all the time. I listened to it for over a decade now and I'm just sick to death of it. Please, get a hobby. Go away. Let us do philosophy, will you? That would be "a promising development".



 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3


More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list