[MD] Bo's weak versus strong interpretation of quantum physiks

[Platt Holden]

On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:04 PM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> dmb said:
> ... Platt has been using quotes selectively for years. He's been ignoring
> the passages about the moral superiority of socialism and the degenerate
> regression back to Victorian values for just as many years. In fact, I'd say
> that intellectual dishonesty is Platt's basic method of operation. I've
> posted the quotes you refer to many, many times as a response to his
> right-wing truth-twisting but it never makes any difference. So I gave up
> trying. But Platt has never given up on lying.
>
> Platt replied:
> Of course, quoting Pirsig saying capitalism is superior to socialism is a
> "waste of time," but quoting him saying he doesn't agree that SOM in the
> intellectual level isn't. In the first instance it's "lying." In the second
> it's holy writ. Makes you wonder who is being "dishonest.".
>
>
> dmb says:
>
> I don't wonder at all who's being dishonest. You use quotes selectively and
> dishonestly in both cases. In both cases you ignore the quotes that don't
> reflect your anti-intellectual, pro-capitalist right-wing agenda. This
> selective reading is conspicuously self-serving and you've always done it
> that way. As a result, your "interpretation" of the MOQ is a grotesque
> distortion. It's hard to imagine what could be less helpful.
>

[Platt]
Evidence for your charges? None. Typical of a left-wing radical (as long as
we're name-calling).