[MD] inorganic patterns & thinking

X Acto xacto at rocketmail.com
Mon Jul 19 05:50:26 PDT 2010


Since the theory is "nothing is real"
test that theory by standing in traffic
or jumping off a building.

see what happens

please


 


----- Original Message ----
From: Magnus Berg <McMagnus at home.se>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 7:24:25 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] inorganic patterns & thinking

On 2010-07-19 11:17, MarshaV wrote:
> Sight at its very least is not about identified objects, only form and
> color.  But one can experience sight sans even form and color too.
> It is ALL conceived.  It's useful and I wouldn't throw away any but the
> arrogance of thinking the "real" has been realized.

Arrogance is there in SOM, yes, because in SOM, there's no other relationship 
between the perceived object in your head and the object observed.

But in MoQ, we know that there *is* a direct dependency from our internal image 
of the object, to the reality of the object via the levels. I'm not saying that 
your brain is supported by *that* stone, but I'm saying that your brain is 
supported by inorganic patterns just *like* a stone.

So, in SOM, ALL is conceived. But in MoQ, where we have the level dependency and 
know that our internal "minds" are supported by inorganic patterns, we can know 
that there are inorganic patterns. From there, I don't think it's arrogant 
anymore to give the stone a status of real.

    Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html



      



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list