[MD] inorganic patterns & thinking
X Acto
xacto at rocketmail.com
Mon Jul 19 05:50:26 PDT 2010
Since the theory is "nothing is real"
test that theory by standing in traffic
or jumping off a building.
see what happens
please
----- Original Message ----
From: Magnus Berg <McMagnus at home.se>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 7:24:25 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] inorganic patterns & thinking
On 2010-07-19 11:17, MarshaV wrote:
> Sight at its very least is not about identified objects, only form and
> color. But one can experience sight sans even form and color too.
> It is ALL conceived. It's useful and I wouldn't throw away any but the
> arrogance of thinking the "real" has been realized.
Arrogance is there in SOM, yes, because in SOM, there's no other relationship
between the perceived object in your head and the object observed.
But in MoQ, we know that there *is* a direct dependency from our internal image
of the object, to the reality of the object via the levels. I'm not saying that
your brain is supported by *that* stone, but I'm saying that your brain is
supported by inorganic patterns just *like* a stone.
So, in SOM, ALL is conceived. But in MoQ, where we have the level dependency and
know that our internal "minds" are supported by inorganic patterns, we can know
that there are inorganic patterns. From there, I don't think it's arrogant
anymore to give the stone a status of real.
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list