[MD] Social Intellectual

[Ian Glendinning]

Jeez Bo if you don't stop ranting - your shouting contest - and read
what I actually say then what's the point ...

Inserted in good faith ...

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:16 AM,  <skutvik at online.no> wrote:
> Ian, DMB and Mob.
>
> 20 July
>
> Ian to John:
>
>> > Intellect only leaves out the aesthetic leading edge IF we adopt some
>> > limited dumb SOMist idea of what intellect is.
>
> If hell bent on rejecting Phaedrus' revolutionary idea (in ZAMM that
> Pre-intellectual Quality had spawned Intellectual Quality) who am I to
> prevent you. "Intellect leaves out the aesthetic leading edge" what
> nonsense!

I said the opposite - I agree.
My sentence included "if" and "only", both left out of your snip. (I
think your problem may simply be the English language ?)

Bo > Intellect is a static level - do we at least agree there?

Ian - Yes, but like all levels it comprises patterns that are evolving
thanks to the action of DQ.

>
> Rationality - Intellect - must be kept high and dry as the highest static
> value, but subordinated a greater system that has the DQ/SQ matrix
> as existence's fundament. Your (DMB) suggestion is outright dangerous: a
> science introducing rhetorics as criteria!!! The theory that wins a
> shouting contest is declared true. Ian may not know what is at stake,

Cut out the FUCKING PERSONAL INSULTS Bo,
and argue with what people actually say,
or just SHUT THE FUCK UP.

I'm off to the hills .... sort the DICKHEAD out Horse.
Ian