[MD] re squirrel

[skutvik at online.no]

Hi Adrie.

22 July u wrote to DMB:

> Thx for the reply, been reading this fern- eagle item, short but nice,
> very nice. After this i was reading the continuation of the wars on
> Bo, been thinking about it.

How easily you fall victim to DMB's rhetoric. He is a true Sophist who 
can turn heads, but to me he is transparent - a staunch SOM-ist who 
just perfunctory refer to the MOQ to promote his own cause.. 

> Strangely i have the feeling to tell him he's on thin ice now...
> How can i tell him, in a friendly way, ...."Bo" i think you are solid
> as titanic as a man, but  be carefull not to- HIT- the iceberg.

No offense intended, but like your neighbor Andre Broersen you first 
praise me, but is then lured by DMB's sly writings and start an anti-Bo 
campaign. But the MOQ is the strong interpretation, or a travesty. The 
theoretical physicists have now dropped all hopes of aligning SOM 
physics with Quantum Physics and it's about time to drop the weak 
interpretation of the MOQ that tries to make the MOQ an expansion of 
intellect, which isn't possible. Q-intellect is MOQ's property that the 
MOQ in no way can be an expansion of. What the weaklings don't see 
is that the "intellect" THEY speak of is SOM's "mind" and if that is 
allowed into the MOQ it (the MOQ) is done for.  

Bodvar



PS
Thanks for the article on Quantum Physics. Do you know the 
experiments - I know only the Alain Aspect one - that affirmed the 
Quantum weirdness (they call).














> The squirrel, yes , i'm shortcutting always , sorry for that, some of
> it is due lack of time, some about my rudimentair english.
> 
> Well the squirrel can take as many  position as possible  , same goes
> for the observer. Yet both can go on indefinetly, staying out of sight
>  for eachother.
> 
> this model describes the "event horizon", as it is written there, both
> are in a different system of coordinates, and will remain so. they
> appear to exist in the same reality, but it is in fact our mind that
> is saying , they are,...(the observer is misled , as he is also in a
> different system of coordinates)(this represent us , now , making this
> example).
> 
> But, Pirsig says, "we are the squirrel", and yes indeed, the squirrel
> needs to be the observer, (observing ONLY his reality) and the hunter
> is an  observer,(observing ONLY his reality) then both realities are
> true at the same time. Multiple realities allowed at the same time,
> and note this , 'time' is in the model as there is a beginning of the
> hiding event and an end.
> 
> as both realitys are different and true at the same time,then also
> time is different in both realitys( different systems of coordinates.)
> (relativity of time) Theory of relativity, time is relative, depending
> on the observer/observed: and system of coordinates.
> 
> reality is relative, different event horizons are possible, different
> timescale's, yet all is true at the same time towards us, actors in
> this tought experiment. because we are in a different reality , we
> observe from an other point of view, another moment in  time.
> 
> 
> this is a good conclusion, for the squirrel his reality is local , if
> he considers the hunters reality it is  non-local and of course vice
> versa
> 
> this is all an interpretation of relativity, and a good one.
> 
> did some reading in pirsigs annotations on lila's child , Pirsig
> clearly and specifically objects to Bells theorem, this is a model
> concerning Local_versus non_local reality in correlation with space,
> but the theoreme does not violate what i'm saying above, nor pirsigs
> objections towards it. The theoreme is under debate until today.
> apparantly Pirsig was aware of this.(he is not mentioning this)
> 
> 
> Okay , this is for today, i have to sleep now , early shift you know
> 
> Greetzz, Adrie
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
>