[MD] re dmb

[Fam. Kintziger-Karaca]

> Bo replied:
> "Intellectual patterns for interpreting reality" is SOM to the hilt. An objective reality "out there" with countless subjective interpretations "in here". We see how the QUALITY/MOQ meta-metaphysics fits this. Quality now the objective realm with the MOQ one of the many subjective interpretations. Good Grief.
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> 
> This is probably THEE central misconception from which all of your nonsense flows. You are interpreting this as if Quality were an objective reality, which is exactly what it is NOT. So-called objective reality is what it is regardless of what we think about it and there can only ever be one so-called objective truth because there is only one objective reality, the physical universe. The MOQ rejects that notion and replaces it with Dynamic Quality. DQ is direct everyday experience, not matter or material reality. It is not an objective reality that is what it is regardless of whether or not anyone knows about it. As William James put it, "realities are what they are experienced as". This assertion is positioned AGAINST the idea that reality is "out there", separate from our experience of it. Instead, the idea that reality is "out there" is relegated to secondary status. It's just an idea, derived from the primary empirical reality, which is just the cutting edge of experien
 ce itself and not a thing, not a substance, that is not yet sorted into categories like "physical" or "psychical".
> 


comment Adrie

yes , i agree Dave, here one is able to see how Bo is braking the chain in the first place , he is taking off on "the" misconception to begin with.

the problem is not to peel down the onion in the first place , but to create the onion as an onion. he peels the onion down to a carrot