[MD] inorganic patterns & thinking

[MarshaV]

On Jul 25, 2010, at 4:59 PM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> 
> 
>>>> 1. The "patterns that identify it" are the formulas we use to
>>>> calculate the gravitational force, i.e. F=g*m (or F=G*m1*m2/r^2)
>>>> using Newton's version.
>>>> 
>>>> 2. The "force" is what's stopping you from banging your head in the
>>>> ceiling if you jump upwards indoors.
>>>> 
>>>> The two are different. That's what the levels are all about. To be
>>>> able to tell things like these apart. They are not ghosts anymore
>>>> as Phaedrus thought in ZMM, they are different types/levels of
>>>> patterns.
>>> 
>>> Neither are wrong, but what would this force be without those
>>> patterns?  Unknown.
>> 
>> Without 1 it would be unknown, but not unreal. That's a heck of a difference.
> 
> How could something that is unknown be real in any sense of the word?  
> How would it be judged real in any sense of the word?  You will need to 
> explain your logic.  


Oh, maybe it is that if it is unknown, it would not exist to be labeled either 
real OR unreal???  

 
___