[MD] Re Arlo

[X Acto]

> Platt:
> What question?
>
> Ron:
> I'll repost it below
>
>
>
> [Platt]
> Arlo says Pirsig could change his mind except about one of his opinions.
> Duh.
>
> All the rest is just the usual insults, name calling, bombast and pomposity
> with lot of armchair psychology
> thrown in to question motives which only exist in a distempered
> imagination.
> As usual, there's no mention
> of other supporters of Bo's position. The fear he's right is palpable.
>
> Ron:
> Right about what? his own opinion, the affirmation of your own?
> How can one be right about an interpretation?
>

[Platt]
Right in that Bo's interpretation may reflect Pirsig's own which may have
changed since his note in LC.


Ron:
And the MoRaT interpretation may reflect Pirsigs own
interpretation too. You just never know.


> Clarity and consistancy, economy of explanation, those are
> examples of how one might hold a more accurate interpretation.
>
> More accurate mind you.
>
> If all you have is interpretation as the base of your arguement
> then one interpretation is just as good as any other.
>
> The question is, what makes one better than the other?
>

[Platt]
Do you believe one interpretation is just as good as another? I don't. Bo's
interpretation is better because it makes the MOQ more harmonious.

Ron:
Please explain how it makes the MOQ more harmonious. 







>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html