[MD] Re Arlo

plattholden at gmail.com plattholden at gmail.com
Mon Jul 26 06:55:41 PDT 2010


On 26 Jul 2010 at 14:28, Horse wrote:

Could you explain this further Platt as I'm not sure what you mean by the 
Intellectual Level being a subset of the MoQ.


On 26/07/2010 14:10, Platt Holden wrote:
>> >  Bo'sinterpretation is better because it makes the MOQ more harmonious.
>> >
>> >  Ron:
>> >  Please explain how it makes the MOQ more harmonious.
>> >
>>
> [Platt]
> By making the intellectual level a subset of the MOQ, thereby avoiding the
> disharmony of recursion.

Hi Horse,

I used "subset" to mean "subordinate" as expressed by Pirsig in the Baggini 
interview:

" I think you are right. Let's drop the word, "absolute," and simply say that 
"And in fact the Metaphysics of Quality actually supports the subject-object 
distinction as a subordinate part of its own structure." "

Hopes this answers your question.
Platt  



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list