[MD] Re Arlo
plattholden at gmail.com
plattholden at gmail.com
Mon Jul 26 06:55:41 PDT 2010
On 26 Jul 2010 at 14:28, Horse wrote:
Could you explain this further Platt as I'm not sure what you mean by the
Intellectual Level being a subset of the MoQ.
On 26/07/2010 14:10, Platt Holden wrote:
>> > Bo'sinterpretation is better because it makes the MOQ more harmonious.
>> >
>> > Ron:
>> > Please explain how it makes the MOQ more harmonious.
>> >
>>
> [Platt]
> By making the intellectual level a subset of the MOQ, thereby avoiding the
> disharmony of recursion.
Hi Horse,
I used "subset" to mean "subordinate" as expressed by Pirsig in the Baggini
interview:
" I think you are right. Let's drop the word, "absolute," and simply say that
"And in fact the Metaphysics of Quality actually supports the subject-object
distinction as a subordinate part of its own structure." "
Hopes this answers your question.
Platt
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list