[MD] Re Arlo

[Horse]

  Bo

On 27/07/2010 15:57, skutvik at online.no wrote:
> Horse
>
> You wrote to Platt
>> Could you explain this further Platt as I'm not sure what you mean by
>> the Intellectual Level being a subset of the MoQ.
>
> Isn't it clear to you what Platt mean by  the 4th. level being a MOQ
> subset or property? This is probably the stumbling stone for all you
> Buchanans, believing that SOM's intellect - thinking itself or MIND -
> goes on as MOQ's 4th. static level. No wonder you have problems.
> See below for Arlo.
>
>
I thought it would be a good idea for Platt to clarify what he meant. It 
was just as I suspected though.
The only stumbling stone here Bo is that you (and a very few other folk) 
are incapable of understanding the first thing about Pirsig's ideas and 
how they fit together. Shame really as you've had the best part of 15 
years to do it and access to some very very good people who do 
understand Pirsig and can articulate that knowledge well.

-- 

"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa