[MD] Bo's weak versus strong interpretation of quantum physiks

[Magnus Berg]

Hi

> [Platt]
> I think (subject), therefore I am (objective state of being). Get it? The
> real mystery is how you think I equated a supernatural theistic world view
> with
> SOM.
>
> [Krimel]
> I think (subject), therefore I am (subjective state of being). Get it there
> is not objective there are at all. Descartes moves on from here to derive
> objectives but at this point it is just solipsism.

Just had to chime in here. The MoQ's stance here is actually:

I think (I (subject), experience the ideas (object) in my brain)
therefore I exist in the same stack in which my physical brain resides. 
Because ideas are intellectual patterns and all patterns are dependent 
on lower level patterns.

	Magnus