[MD] Stacks

[MarshaV]

On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:21 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> On Jul 29, 2010, at 1:39 AM, Magnus Berg wrote:
> 
>> On 2010-07-29 00:12, MarshaV wrote:
>>> On Jul 28, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Magnus Berg wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Don't know if you read my lashing out at Marsha over that word
>>>> "useful" the other day. It's sooo defensive! You can make it mean
>>>> whatever you want it to mean. So what you say is actually nothing.
>>>> You only put as much faith in the levels as you want, and when it
>>>> doesn't suit you anymore, you can just disregard it. That's
>>>> "useless" in my book.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Magnus,
>>> 
>>> Would you point me to the "lashing out".  I seemed to have missed.
>>> Some of you really seem to like to inflate your prowess.
>> 
>> That would be:
>> 
>> "And there's that word again, "useful". When something is useful, you
>> can use it for your own agenda, and when it doesn't suit you, you can
>> just stop using it.
>> 
>> I'm not in it for "useful". If it's just "useful", I wouldn't go near it.
>> 
>> In other words, I don't think you said *anything* with that. You were
>> just trying to smooth things over and sidestep the issue at hand."
>> 
>> From 26/7 in the inorganic patterns & thinking thread.
>> 
>> 	Magnus
> 
> 
> 
> Lashing out?   Right, like an April sprinkle...   


Magnus,

As far as I am concerned, the only reason any static pattern of value exists 
is because it is good that it does exist, good meaning useful.
 
 
Marsha  


 
___