[MD] Capitalism: my experience

[skutvik at online.no]

DMB and Arlo.

2 Mar. :

Bo before:
> > If the MOQ is one intellectual projection and the SOM another and both-
> > every bit as correct, what's the difference? 

Arlo replied:
> Pirsig answered that in the very quote you provided, "... in some
> circumstances [one] provide[s] a better, simpler interpretation. "
> (Pirsig).

dmb says:
> The difference between Newton's physics and Einstein's physics is
> roughly analogous to this. They say the trip to the moon was
> calculated with Newtonian mechanics. On a practical level, it still
> works.  		 	   		 

You two beats Ron and John in density.  If the MOQ merely is another 
impossible effort to transfer a sphere's surface on to a flat sheet and it 
only works for polar expeditions and SOM must be used for equatorial 
dittos what's the use? Isn't the MOQ supposed to the be a 
metaphysical equivalent to a space trip where the earth's true form - 
as a globe - is revealed? The wiseguyish Pirsig plays straight into your 
somish hands. Yes, I know that Newton's physics goes a long way, but 
when it comes to the extreme it fails and SOM (intellect) suffice for all 
"mundane" purposes, but fails (spawn paradoxes) when applied to the 
extreme. Here is when the MOQ comes into play. When will you 
learn.,

Bodvar