[MD] continental and analytic philosophy

[MarshaV]

I thought it was great too.  I almost made the correction as , 'In fact, should I grovel 
to the gravel?'  
 
 
 
 

On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:

> On the contrary Marsha, this is about the wonder of language, and the
> freudian slip by your little ole fingers, created the bon-mot for how
> low it is possible to grovel - down to the gravel in fact. My biggest
> smile of the day so far in fact - please don't withdraw it ;-) It's
> already in "my" dictionary.
> 
> Regards
> Ian
> 
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:12 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Should have been grovel, not gravel.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:01 AM, MarshaV wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Horse,
>>> 
>>> Dave may know what he's talking about, and I may not know what I'm talking about,
>>> but regardless of all my sniping, I wish Dave much success.
>>> 
>>> Horse, should I gravel even lower?  I can you know.  And mean it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:05 AM, Horse wrote:
>>> 
>>>> By being a bit more gracious and admitting that Dave does know what he's talking about?
>>>> 
>>>> On 11/03/2010 08:18, MarshaV wrote:
>>>>> How can one compete with the ample credit that Dave gives himself?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 11, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> DMB said
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "... this question about language and experience, at least roughly, is
>>>>>> about whether it's possible to reconcile Rorty and James. And people
>>>>>> like them too of course. C'mon admit it. That's interesting."
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Good. So yes that IS interesting. I though for a while there we were
>>>>>> debating the no-brainer whether language (and tone and rhetoric and
>>>>>> style of argument) were part of philosophy (or not ?!?!) Phew.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think Matt (and gav and others) are right though ... that there is
>>>>>> an important style difference between "professional philosophy" on the
>>>>>> one hand, trying to situate these arguments in the existing (US
>>>>>> Pragmatist) canon, and those of us amateurs on the other who are
>>>>>> simply comfortable with the obvious facts, enough to get with worrying
>>>>>> about how best to apply them to real life beyond professional
>>>>>> philsophy.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think Dave deserves some credit for the former - even if it sets up
>>>>>> a viscious cycle of mutual frustration between the professionals and
>>>>>> the amateurs.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Ian
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"... Hunter S Thompson
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___