[MD] atheistic and content
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Fri Mar 12 04:56:43 PST 2010
On Mar 12, 2010, at 7:32 AM, gav wrote:
> wow - i hadn't seen those before.
> i really disagree
>
> i think writing off the bible is very bad idea. we understand our cultural lineage little enough
> without ignoring the central text. like telling the chinese to ignore confucious and lao tzu.
Gav, you may think it is a bad idea. I think it is a great idea! But I'm not telling you
what to think. I tossed my bible into the garbage and dumped coffee grounds and
egg shells on top. And poop to this culture. It's suffering from a dis-ease and the
bible, torah and koran are a part of the cause of that dis-ease, or least a major symptom.
In the end, kill confusious (not sure confusious belongs in this category), laotzu
and the buddha.
>
> you can't solve religious problems - they are mysteries. how do you solve the tao? or the mystery of the cross. pirsig is naive here
>
> quality is nature; so quality is pantheistic? sounds like spinoza. pantheism is a theism.
>
> pirsig misconstrues faith; faith is at the heart of everything - it is what it means to know oneself. the delphic maxim and faith are identical.
>
> intellectual truth? what is that? intellectual truth is existential truth - truth is not generalisable, truth is a pathless land (krishnamurti).
>
> spirit and faith are existential terms. dropping existential criteria is at odds with an using a radically empirical metaphysics. it is incongruent.
>
> from these annotations pirsig doesn't look much better than dawkins.
Dawkins? Is that some sort of denigration? Resorting to name calling? Is the association
suppose to be scary? - RMP is unique!
And the a 'pathless land' would seem to me to be without the traditional paths required.
That's how I interpret. Throw all the paths away. It's right in front of you.
Marsha
>
>
> --- On Fri, 12/3/10, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>> From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>> Subject: Re: [MD] atheistic and content
>> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>> Received: Friday, 12 March, 2010, 11:11 PM
>>
>>
>> On Mar 12, 2010, at 6:34 AM, gav wrote:
>>
>>> atheism may be a nonsensical position.
>>> it is like saying - 'here is this concept [of god]
>> that i have imagined, now i am going to pretend it doesn't
>> exist.
>>
>>
>> Gav,
>>
>> Atheism to me is a low-value social static
>> pattern.
>>
>> [Definition: Atheists are people who believe that god
>> or gods
>> (or other supernatural beings) are man-made constructs,
>> myths and legends or who believe that these concepts are
>> not meaningful.]
>>
>> No existence/non-existence to debate.
>>
>>>
>>> there is no transcendent ground to validate our
>> imaginings - quality, god, tao, fish, bubblewrap: all
>> imaginary and real
>>
>>
>> There is unpatterned experience which is available, and
>> sans drugs offers a rich, vital experience beyond
>> words.
>>
>> A cookbook or a romance novel can contain wisdom. I
>> do not know how anyone can defend that violent, sexist crap
>> that is the bible.
>>
>> I was most grateful that RMP, as the MoQ's author, made it
>> so clear:
>>
>>
>> "The MOQ supports religion but does not support many
>> Christian traditions."
>> (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
>>
>> The MOQ is an atheistic religious outlook that solves
>> rather than bypasses religious problems.
>> (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
>>
>> "Quality is nature. The MOQ says there is no spiritual
>> principle in man that makes knowledge possible. Nature does
>> the whole job."
>> (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
>>
>> “The MOQ does not rest on faith. In the MOQ faith is very
>> low quality stuff, a willingness to believe falsehoods.”
>> (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
>>
>> "The MOQ would add a fourth stage where the term "God" is
>> completely dropped as a relic of an evil social suppression
>> of intellectual and Dynamic freedom. The MOQ is not just
>> atheistic in this regard. It is anti-theistic."
>> (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
>>
>> "The selling out of intellectual truth to the social icons
>> of organized religion is seen by the MOQ as an evil act."
>> (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
>>
>> “For quality, no faith is required because there is no
>> way you can disbelieve that there is such a thing as
>> quality.”
>> (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
>>
>> "When you hear the words 'spirit' and 'faith' always look
>> for a traditional religionist trying to sneak his goods in
>> the back door. ...like the positivists, the MOQ drops spirit
>> and faith, cold."
>> (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
>>
>>
>> Hurray!!!
>>
>>
>>
>> Marsha, of the hurray.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- On Fri, 12/3/10, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>>>> Subject: [MD] atheistic and content
>>>> To: "MoQ" <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
>>>> Received: Friday, 12 March, 2010, 10:14 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've always thought of the moq as an
>> atheistic,
>>>> anti-thesitic place where
>>>> I might be a religious person who doesn't believe
>> in god,
>>>> or better yet,
>>>> a place without such divisions as I and
>>>> god.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list