[MD] DMB and Me

[David Thomas]

On 3/20/10 9:43 AM, "skutvik at online.no" <skutvik at online.no> wrote:

> Hi Dave T. (R2D2)

I assume your R2D2 jibe is suggesting I am a robot where your posts are
concerned. True enough my endless loop responds to your endless loop. I like
to think I'm not as stuck in mine as you are in yours. None so blind as
those who will not see. But we are surely both wrong to some degree.

> (he actually says classic knowledge but it must be Quality, no?) while the
> leading edge is Romantic Quality. This can safely be translated into
> DQ/SQ ... no?

No? No? Not safely, as you have shown. Classic knowledge (the train and the
track behind its nose) of ZaMM is translated into four stable levels of
commonly recognizable quality patterns in Lila existing (floating, swimming,
growing, walking, thinking, farting, etc) in a sea or field of mystic
Dynamic Quality (the groundstuff that holds up and makes the track, train,
and all its cargo). Romantic Knowledge is a moving plane at the leading edge
of the moving engine. An multifaceted instantaneous event. Romantic Quality
is not Dynamic Quality. Romantic Quality is however experienced, translated,
and made part of the static levels.  Though under SOM it is classified as
unverifiable subjective nonsense. And it is!  So live with it, I do.

Dave