[MD] DMB and Me

[Andre Broersen]

The Holy Father to 'his' child:

I think he should have left the "leading edge" as the DQ metaphor and
the train the SQ ditto, not introduced a still bigger Quality that the
DQ/SQ "rides on" ... the pesky QUALITY/MOQ meta-metaphysics
again.

Andre:
The 'pesky etc'is your invention Bodvar.
If you mean Quality (dynamic) and the MoQ (a description of the
presumed DQ/SQ 'interplay') then yes.

Andre previously:
So, from a static perspective you have the DQ/SQ interplay, the dance
>  of Lila. From a Dynamic perspective you have pure experience.DQ.

Bodvar
Dynamic Quality  (of the MOQ) is "pure experience", to postulate some
Quality still more dynamic than DQ threatens the MOQ

Andre:
No one postulates another Quality. I was suggesting the 'view' of Quality
from 2 different perspectives; the static one; the DQ/SQ dance of Lila and
DQ. In direct experience there is no MoQ. The MoQ is a static, intellectual
pattern of value because it is a high quality static description of
conventional reality (the world of everyday affairs).

I'll repeat one sentence for you Bodvar. I repeat it because you have avoided
answering it previously: in direct experience there is no MoQ. You claim the
MoQ= Reality. Thus you claim that the MoQ= direct experience. To avoid mis-
understanding: the sign = means 'equivalent to'.

The fallacy of this position should be obvious. Yet you maintain it.

Quality cannot be 'contained' in any belief systems. It cannot be 'captured'
in reports, tradition, hearsay, or any authority. Not even in a metaphysics.
Mr. Pirsig is very, very clear about this.

So what do ya reckon ol'man?

Andre