[MD] Hot stoves and those who sit on them

[MarshaV]

Ham,

You are correct.  


Marsha    




On Mar 31, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Ham Priday wrote:

> Hi Marsha --
> 
> 
>> How about 'objective point-of-view', or, not to be nit-picky,
>> are you looking for definition that is essentially yours?
> 
> "Objective point of view" is fine; but a POV should not be regarded as an "attitude".  It's a worldview -- a particular way of conceptualizing reality.
> 
> No, Marsha, I'm not trying to push my own definitions or terminology on the MoQ.  However, where there is a legitimate difference between the MoQ and Essentialism, I want to be able to explain it in terms that will be understood here.  All too often "special connotations" make this difficult.
> 
> In pursuit of clarity,
> Ham
> 
> 


 
___