[MD] Reading & Comprehension

Andre Broersen andrebroersen at gmail.com
Sun May 2 01:43:38 PDT 2010


Marsha to Andre:

The definition of MoQ that I hold most close to my heart because I know it
most intimately is:  Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience),
which I formally extend to : MoQ = Reality is Quality(DQ(unpatterned experience)/static
quality(patterned experience(inorganic,biological,social&Intellectual(SOM))))

I stated my view as the MoQ is both an explanation and the
metaphysical assumption that reality = quality.

Andre:
Quality is the 'ineffable'. The MOQ is a high quality, static, intellectual explanation of static experience as it is abstracted from pure, immediate experience. It has placed this experience within an evolutionary framework.

Marsha:
It was not Bo's arguments that convinced me that the Intellectual Level is SOM, but my own realization, more from my reading of Buddhist texts and thinking about it than anything Bo said.

Andre:
In SOM, pre-intellectual empirical reality of value does not exist. SOM holds subjects and objects as primary. We are 'subjects' experiencing an 'objective' world 'out there'. Is that what you are convinced of?

Marsha:
You didn't seem to care what I wrote.

Andre:
If I don't care about what you write, why should I bother with this conversation?

Marsha:
Force?  You, and Ron too, remind me of a man who beats his wife
and later tells her he beats her because he cares so much.  I don't
buy your excuse.

Andre:
You are also capable of some pretty low quality observations. I was applying force to my own argument Marsha...not to anything or anybody else.

Marsha:
You have not been designated Mr. Pirsig's spokesperson, or the MoQ's
gatekeeper, and Mr. Pirsig has said there is no papal bull.  Bo has every
right to argue his position until the cows come home.

Andre:
Absolutely right. And even though Mr.Pirsig has said this of his own words with regards to the intellectual level that surely doesn't mean that any old interpretation goes. Mr. Pirsig has stated that Bodvar's (and Platt's)interpretation 'undermines'the essence of the MOQ.

And the cows will still be coming home long after you and I and Bodvar have left.

Marsha:
I think Mary is quite responsible for her own interpretation.  She will think it
through to her own satisfaction, she's a very intelligent woman.

Andre:
Totally agree. But very intelligent people are capable of being confused no?

Marsha:
You should share your opinion as much as you need to, but to think that it should have
any impact on anyone is strange.  I write mostly to try to understand what I think.  Since
I am so introverted it is difficult to share but I benefit by trying to find good words.

Andre:
Oh. Okay, since you only talk to yourself to help yourself understand yourself, why not write your own blog?

Over and out.




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list