[MD] Ham's theory of Truth

[MarshaV]

>> Marsha
>> I understand the only way towards an Ultimate Truth is to discover the
>> falseness of static patterns(experience): not this, not that.   There
>> is no permanence to static patterns(experience) so in what sense could
>> they ever be true.  Could it be that patterns that last longer are
>> somehow more true?  But that would mean time is the measure of truth,
>> and time is itself a static pattern of value.
>> 
>> 
> [Mary Replies] 
> Yes.  We would do well to contemplate the idea that time itself is a static
> pattern of value.  
> 
> Even SOM has been able to discern as much by arriving at the Heisenburg
> Uncertainty Principle through SOMish methods.  The hilarious absurdity of
> this should be telling us something.
> 
> Through SOM we arrived at the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.  This should
> tell us that there was a "time" when time was meaningless.  All the static
> patterns built up on top of this idea of time are false.  The foundation
> upon which these patterns are built is clay.

Hi Mary,

Time and change?  Within the MoQ, change is a movement towards something 
better.  Yes?  And, certainly, clay has been very useful to human's survival.  Yes?
I don't know, Mary, I just get to a place where all I can do is laugh.  No, it isn't
what I thought it was, but now I have no answers.   To be honest, I did shed a 
few tears, but now mostly I laugh.  How amazing!

Werner Heisenberg is one of my heros.  Has he pointed us towards quantum 
buddhism, the MoQ, Quality, what?  

I just don't know...    


Marsha 

 
___