[MD] Reading & Comprehension

[skutvik at online.no]

Hi Arlo
I can't let go of this you input of  23 Apr. where you wrote 

> It would be interesting to perform a find/replace of "Quality" with
> "reality" in ZMM/LILA and see if there are any places where such a
> substitution makes no sense, but I don't have my e-versions on this
> computer.

If you want an e-version of ZAMM I can send it over? Anyway, 
disregarding it's me the recently appointed BOgey who ask,  what was 
your reasoning or point. Or was it someone else who brought up the 
issue?

> For example, though, in this quote you provided. Quality is the
> primary empirical reality"of the world. We would get: Reality is the
> primary empirical reality of the world. Since "the world" is also
> contained by "reality", this would lead to: Reality is the primary
> empirical reality of reality.

Who was it that "provided a quote? Still, I agree with your conclusion if 
"Quality is Reality" then "reality is the primary empirical reality of 
reality".   My point is that there was no metaphysics before the MOQ 
that said "Reality is NOT Quality"! It was only SOM that said that 
qualities, values, morals, good, belong to the subjective realm 
meaning not reliable, just what one thinks, illusory, fleeting  ....etc. 

Much obliged

Bodvar