[MD] e: Reading & Comprehension

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Wed May 12 22:02:39 PDT 2010


Hi Bo,

What dmb took to be a bitter attack was just my frustration with not 
finding the right words.  I really do feel a need to be quiet, and a need
for a silent walk in the woods.  Maybe the words will come.  Thanks for
the support.  I do admire your big heart.


Marsha 
 
 








On May 12, 2010, at 2:56 PM, skutvik at online.no wrote:

> Marsha, Arlo.
> 
> 11 May.:
> 
> [Arlo]
>>> If all intellectual patterns are SOM, what is the "cancerous"
>>> element you speak of? Indeed, what was it that Pirsig lamented when
>>> the Sophists were run under by Plato? We certainly can't lament that
>>> intellect was infested with SOM, since intellect IS SOM. I suppose
>>> you could lament that intellect achieved dominance, but if that is a
>>> bad thing, why did Pirsig place it atop his moral hierarchy?
> 
> ZAMM needs some MOQ adjustment and the Sophist issue is the 
> most needy issue. Their strife with Plato was the budding intellectual 
> level's subjectivism's versus its objectivism that still haunts intellect  
> ...in its SOM capacity role!!!!!. Intellect was not infested with SOM, 
> rather the S/O value fossilizes into a S/O METAPHYSICS !!!  
> 
> Marsha:
>> I understand intellectual patterns to be built on the SOM premise. 
>> Some will stay valid, some will become irrelevant or, indeed, harmful.
>> Those intellectual patterns that lose their validity will fall back
>> into oblivion.  
> 
> Right you are Marsha, Intellect's value is the S/O distinction, which 
> went unchecked on to become a SOM which has given the West a 
> technological heaven but a metaphysical hell  ... until RMP came and 
> cut the Gordic Knot that was impossible to see - much less cut - from 
> within SOM , within intellect. It requires a  bootstrap operation to lift 
> ourselves to the Quality level, something the academics have no 
> intention of trying, they  want, the MOQ  to remain an intellectual 
> pattern and as long as that view rules it's just a complicated  SOM. 
> Arlo may be small fry here, it's DMB who is the big roadblock. 
> 
> Bodvar 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>> [Marsha]
>>> "All one has to do"?  Right!  I'm not so stupid to fall for that
>>> kind of trickery.  Must you resort to such nonsense.
> 
>>> [Arlo]
>>> Sigh. I suppose I should just "meow" and pretend that people don't
>>> write here what they do.
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Your statement was in the same category as "Every schoolchild knows." 
>> It's an insult, and I would prefer not to play that way.  So meow away
>> if you think that wins you intellectual points.  I will just ignore
>> you, or stop playing.   
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> [Marsha]
>>> If you do not like the intellectual level being an advancement over
>>> the social level, maybe you do not agree with the idea of evolution?
>>> 
>>> [Arlo]
>>> Huh? Is today "opposite day"? Did I miss that?
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Maybe I misunderstood, but it seemed you were defending the social
>> level from being called inferior to the intellectual level.  
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list