[MD] heisenberg

[MarshaV]

On May 29, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Fam. Kintziger-Karaca wrote:

> Hi gang, Marsha
> 
> 
> "The solution of the difficulty is that the two mental pictures which 
> experiment lead us to form - the one of the particles, the other of 
> the waves - are both incomplete and have only the validity of 
> analogies which are accurate only in limiting cases."
>   (W.H.)   
> 
> 
> the bigger case today for the Heisenberg uncertainty/relation/priciple is this,
> nowadays in science it is commonly accepted that the heisenbergprinciple-mechanism,
> is not limited to the direct vicinity of the particle.

What mechanism would that be?   Did you read the quote?   


> science is accepting now , that the mechanisme, is hidden in the particle/wave  itself, showing only part of his properties,
> directly to be seen in the near vicinity of the particle, but in physikal reality, it is not clear what we have to imagine
> about the term direct vicinity, is this by the "entanglement effect" direct vicinity--boundarys of the galaxy, or just 
> around the particle?difficult problem.
> see the problem?

You don't really expect me to take what you write seriously?   


> attached problem is this , the energy of a particle can go up , to an indefinete value for a period of time.
> so heisenbergs problem is today a key issue for the collider experiments.

Your credentials?  Wikibaloney?    


> 
> maybe you did see my question for bodvar , about the northern light.
> this is your first lesson in physics, this question.

You are totally hilarious?  


> 
> view , on google "aurora borealis" set google to pictures, you will see the northern light.
> 
> view the pictures , thinking of them like this, the sun is the particle beam throwing enormous masses of energy towards us
> this energy is colliding in the atmosphere with the oxygen/co molecules, showing this superb effect.
> sun , particle beam, atmosphere target, hitting on the oxygen molecules, perfect show , making the impact of the partikels visible.
> 
> so this is what a collider is doiing , same thing , in a controlled environment, (bunker)
> 
> Greetz , adrie, Short of time!
> 

You may be pointing in the correct direction, but I don't know.   Credibility still zero.   


Marsha
 
 
 


 
___