[MD] BeTteR-neSs (undefined or otherwise)

[118]

Hi Andre,
Forgive me for being provocative.  My questions and statements are met with
what you write below.  "You don't understand, read more".  That leads me to
understand that you don't understand.  It is quite possible to respond to my
queries without being condescending.  If I do not understand, then set me
straight.  If you are able to do so then you would have, what I consider to
be, a deep understanding.  Yes, I have read the books, and many many more.

Please provide the Tenants of MOQ in short form, for everybody's education.

May I at least ask that?

Thanks,
Mark

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com>wrote:

> Mark to Dan:
>
> ...superficial statements without depth are not productive.
>
> Andre:
> First it was me and now it is Dan who is not 'deep' enough for you Mark.
> What do you want? Yea I know, the four year old contemplating the infinitude
> of the universe, I mean, who can compete with that?
>
> From what I have read about your post you do not even seem to grasp the
> superficial tenets of the MOQ, so before you start adjudging people on the
> 'depth' of their contributions...read some LILA snd ZMM please. And
> remember...all in good fun.
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>