[MD] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Is this the inadequacy of the,MOQ?

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Thu Nov 4 12:20:03 PDT 2010


On Nov 4, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> 
> You are of that brigade...
> 
> Andre:
> Yes indeed Bodvar did present an intellectual challenge, misguided but yeah. I accept that. But when I read things like:
> 
> 'I'm fine with intelligence arising of Quality'.
> 
> 'Perhaps Religion arises out of Quality, but one could also say that Quality comes from God (after all, the concept of God came first)'.
> 
> then I truly do wonder if the books have been read. Mr. Pirsig has made very clear statements about these things. And this is not a matter of dogma, it a matter of being clear about what is meant by what, and for what reason. We're talking MOQ remember?
> 
> And the old hand Platt is slippery. He pulled the latest trick out of his hat not long ago when he hid, after being cornered, by arguing that the MOQ (parts of which he uses to justify and solidify his own beliefs), is just theory anyway. The bucket and snot stand as firmly as ever.




And that bucket reflects well on you...   

 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list