[MD] re , Dan

[118]

> Hi Dan,
>
> Thank you for your response.  I respect that and believe I have a different
> approach.  But, sorry, I can't wait in this mire.  Got to go, my watch is
> ticking.  Back down the rabbit hole!  Maybe I'll see you there; it depends
> on how far you are willing to go.
>
> If you haven't seen "What the Bleep do we Know", I would suggest looking at
> it as a tutorial to loosen up the brain a little.
> See you later?
>
>
>> Dan:
>> I'm not sure I do understand when someone complains about reading
>> books or the archives. I am like a kid in a candy store when it comes
>> to that kind of stuff. But I suppose we each have our own experiences
>> and your experience must tell you that you already know all that, so
>> you don't need to read. So be it. To me, though, it is sad. And like I
>> said, it is your loss, not mine.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
I am not being derogatory here, but I do not have patience for Bible
thumpers.  By all means, (re)interpret the books you have, I did that years
ago.  I strongly suspect that you hope to find meaning in this form of
interlocution, and are not just ego protecting itself.  I can certainly
withdraw the hand of reconciliation if that helps you.

Cheers,
Mark

Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
>