[MD] Intellectual Level
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Mon Nov 8 04:51:04 PST 2010
Hello again Tim,
On Nov 7, 2010, at 8:36 PM, rapsncows at fastmail.fm wrote:
> Marsha,
> a quick comment or three below,
> Tim
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 03:44:17 -0400, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> said:
>>
>> Greetings Tim,
>>
>> I have no objection to the conventional use of 'self' and objects.'
>> These
>> patterns have evolved because of their usefulness, but their independence
>> is an illusion.
>
> Tim:
> Is their interdependence an illusion?
Marsha:
If you think that interdependence exist independently than I suppose it is
an illusion.
>> My definition of intelligence is not confined to the intellectual level,
>> but is
>> the skillful use of whichever appropriate patterns (organic, biological,
>> social
>> & intellectual) a given situation requires,
>
> Tim:
> requires... requires for what?
Marsha:
Required in the moment. But that has already gone by. Too late...
>> or possibly to use no
>> patterns
>> if something dynamic is required.
>>
>> I also believe there is a knowledge that comes from direct experience
>> (insight)
>> that is beyond word-bound.
>
> Tim:
> I only wonder whether I need a different word from knowledge. I know
> Phaedrus said, you know quality... I think I lean more to a verb form
> of faith.
Marsha:
I suppose that depends if you mean faith or FAITH. Quality(unpatterned
experience/patterned experience), what requires faith?
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list