[MD] Plains Talk and Pragmatism

[118]

Hi John,
Yes, this thing.  It could be interpreted psychologically as the need to
form a conceptual framework that others agree with.  Of course there are
those that will not agree with it.  The more real we make it, the more we
need to defend it because it becomes a defense of one's sanity and purpose.
 I would agree, let's discuss the Quality of MOQ rather than talking about
the un-Quality of other things.  Some of these things have stood the test of
time.  MOQ needs to make that same attempt before it can be compared.
Sorry, not in this lifetime guys.  Perhaps MOQ will be a very big problem
to.  Scenes of 1984 come to mind.

Mark

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:03 PM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:

> The "thing about religion", dave, is that it is a very big problem for the
> world and we can't erase the problem by burying our head in the sand and
> pretending it doesn't exist.  The MoQ is either a good tool for dealing
> with
> the world as it is, or it's not.  If it's going to antagonize the vast
> majority of the world's population with being "anti" their most pressing
> need and reality, then it really can't do any good, can it?
>
>
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>