[MD] Levels of intelligence, a brief scientific excursion

[MarshaV]

On Nov 21, 2010, at 2:20 AM, 118 (Mark) wrote:

> 
> Now that everybody is quite bored with this or given up, I will end this
> here.  This brief excursion into the field of science is not meant to
> provide support to or dismiss the notion of dynamic or static Quality, but
> may be of interest to some.  The metaphysical interpretations of these
> things do not require the intrusion of science for support.  Suffice it to
> say, that if we do go into scientific support for MOQ, it becomes quite
> complicated and perhaps not productive.  Science is yet another
> interpretation of reality, nothing more, nothing less.




HI Mark, 

I still think the best understanding of "reality" is found in Lila's words: "...I'm whatever your questions turn me into. You don't see that. It's your questions that make me who I am. If you think I'm an angel then that's what I am. If you think I'm a whore then that's what I am. I'm whatever you think. And if you change your mind about me then I change too. So whatever Richard tells you, it's true. There's no way he can lie about me."    -    Reality is whatever you think it is there's no way you can lie about it, and if you change your understanding of reality, then reality changes too.   

So pick your favorite category of knowledge from which to form the questions:  physics, chemistry, biology, psychology, philosophy, theology, art, &etc., &etc., &etc.  

---   

I find you remarkable because you seem to continually clear away debris from the dance floor to make way for new creative movement.  You change topic, change understanding.  John does this too.   -  Sometimes, though, I yearn for a GOF RMP quote.  Here:    “ The most moral activity of all is the creation of space for life to move around.”  - Robert M. Pirsig  



Marsha  
 



___