[MD] Is this the inadequacy of the MOQ?

John Carl ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Sat Nov 27 11:56:39 PST 2010


Andre,

". . the word or sign which man uses is the man himself
Thus my language is the sum-total of myself; for the man is the
thought."

Charles Sanders Peirce



On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com>wrote:

> John to Andre:
>
>
> The words come first.
>
> Andre:
> Yes John, first you think about it, then you plan it, then you use words to
> fuse the two and then you are going to experience it...planned and all so
> that nothing will or may elude you. Make sure you catch the pre-allocated
> 'views' so you will not miss anything.
>
> This is the wanking Mr.Pirsig talked about. It gets you excited, you come,
> and leaves you empty and let down. Hollow, even worse off from where you
> started. Sad.
>
> This is the SOM way of having defined DQ ahead of you and for you. Just
> come in and enjoy. If you don't, you miss out and if you say it is a fraud
> and a wank they will ask you what is wrong with you.
>
> PARADISE-PARADISE-PARADISE
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list