[MD] Emptiness & Quantum Mechancics

[John Carl]

Marsha, listen to the last part again. That last couple of minutes.   I've
transcribed it for others who can't be bothered to wade through 8 or so
minutes of excellent rhetoric"

"The two radical poles- that which is absolutely objective  and that which
absolutely subjective, are null sets, they're equally empty.  Now where does
that leave us? The foolish person says 'I get it -  Nothing exists- Nihilism
- foolishness.  What I want to do, metaphorically, is take out a little
knife and pffft - (pop their balloon).  I want to bring them back.  Yes,
absolutel objectivity and absolute subjectivity - empty.    So where is
reality to be found? The entanglement between."

There is your synonym for Quality, my dear: The Entanglement Between.


John


On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:01 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
> I think it is acceptable within the MoQ to consider Emptiness equivalent to
> Quaiity...
>
>
> Emptiness & Quantum Mechanics  (8 minutes)
>               by B. Alan Wallace
>
>
>
> http://web.me.com/ksnowsb108/B._Alan_Wallace_Podcasts/Podcast/Entries/2009/2/7_Emptiness_%26_Quantum_Mechanics.html
>
>
> Bio:  Dr. Wallace, a scholar and practitioner of Buddhism since 1970, has
> taught Buddhist theory and meditation worldwide since 1976. Having devoted
> fourteen years to training as a Tibetan Buddhist monk, ordained by H. H. the
> Dalai Lama, he went on to earn an undergraduate degree in physics and the
> philosophy of science at Amherst College and a doctorate in religious
> studies at Stanford.
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>