[MD] Emptiness & Quantum Mechancics

[MarshaV]

On Oct 9, 2010, at 1:31 PM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:47 PM, david buchanan wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Andre said:
>> 
>> The MOQ is arrived at through radical empiricism. Without an understanding of this it would seem, to me, extremely difficult to get a grasp on the MOQ, and for that matter, those concepts named 'truth' (a high quality intellectual pattern) and 'emptiness' or 'nothingness' ('There is nothing in the sense of no 'thing', that is, 'no object', and the Buddhists use nothingness in this way, but the term Dynamic is more in keeping within the quotation, 'Within nothingness there is a great working' (from the Zen master, Katagiri Roshi' in Anthony's PhD, p 35.)   Hence my confusion re Marsha's insistence that all is unpatterned...bla bla...whilst maintaining that the intellectual level is SOM.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> dmb says:
>> 
>> I think confusion is the most appropriate reaction to Marsha's formulations. They are contradictory and incoherent.
> 
> 
> Marsha:
> And this stated by someone who the other day was reifying his imagination into "fiercest rivals."

Marsha:
Your so fearful that these "fiercest rivals" will undermine your point-of-view that you cannot send a post without insult comments.  What a wienie!!!  


 
___