[MD] [Bulk] Re: Emptiness & Quantum Mechancics

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Sun Oct 10 08:55:26 PDT 2010


Andre

There is nothing wrong with being pragmatic and not wanting to 
a part of the Pragmatism movement.  And I have stated many times 
before that Buddhism adheres to a radical form of empiricism and is 
extremely pragmatic.  And other than as a historical note, I'm not much 
interested in W. James.  Deal with it.  Or not.  Dmb's preference has 
little influence on me, and there is a relationship between the MoQ 
and Buddhism which is the connection I prefer to pursue.  


Marsha 


  




On Oct 10, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> 
> Marsha previously:
> 
> My primary mission is not to support  'contemporary pragmatism'.
> 
> Marsha now:
> I support being pragmatic.
> 
> But that doesn't mean I am going to adopt dmb's notion of Contemporary Pragmatism.
> 
> Andre:
> You are beginning to adopt Bodvar's method of extricating yourself from an untenable position
> whereby you lose a sense of what you are talking about, the implications of what you are talking
> about, and the direction that it takes you. You begin to invent things, twist things, bend things
> etc, to try to get yourself out of admitting you are lost.
> Before long you'll have invented six different streams of pragmatism as decoys.
> 
> Dmb is talking about pragmatism plain and simple, William James's pragmatism the one the MOQ subscribes to
> and indeed has improved upon.
> 
> The reason why I did not copy the 2.7 section for all to see is because I have to do it by hand, and it is a
> little lengthy and, I know that in response I get a one-line dismissal.
> 
> Let's just say that Bodvar has his MOQ and that we now have Marsha's pragmatism.
> 
> Marsha:
> I have repeatedly stated I am study the MoQ as a bridge between East and West.
> 
> Andre:
> Yes you have. And very recently you said you try to do this from a Buddhist perspective and a little
> while ago you stated that you are not a Buddhist nor an expert in it.
> 
> Have you actually read Northrop's 'The Meeting of East and West'? It is the book young Phaedrus read on
> the ship taking him back to America after his stint in Korea. It is referred to in ZMM.
> Mr. Pirsig calls himself a student of Northrop. It may be a good idea to start there to give yourself
> an overall context within which to place the(scholarly side)of the MOQ.
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list