[MD] Metaphor

[118]

OK, I was just asking for clarification.  By saying we are constellations,
one has to assume that there is something creating such constellations.
 Like making a bear out of stars in the heavens.  There really is not a bear
(I don't think) but it takes an ordered mind to create such a thing.  What
such words denote to me is that you were saying that Quality was creating
such order.  I didn't have a problem with this, it's as good a premise as
any.  Thus my question for clarification.  But if you say no, then I need to
reinterpret your use of constellations.  I am fine if you want to move on, I
am just looking for clues.

Thanks,
Mark

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:58 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
> Marsha:
> No, Mark, I've decided to let you do the talking.  If your point is a
> creator, talk away.   If your point is language, I image you can say
> something interesting about that too.
>
>
>
> On Oct 11, 2010, at 2:10 AM, 118 wrote:
>
> > OK then, you are talking about a creator.  Why don't you just come out
> and
> > say it.
> >
> > Thanks for the info,
> > Mark
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 4:42 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Oct 10, 2010, at 5:46 PM, 118 wrote:
> >>
> >>> Marsha said
> >>> I'm not lying.  Were just constellations of static patterns of value.
>  I
> >>> understand that.
> >>>
> >>> Mark asks:
> >>> A constellation requires an outside observer to connect the points.
>  Are
> >> you
> >>> saying that there is somebody outside creating our constellations?  Or
> >> are
> >>> you misusing words?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Marsha suggests:
> >> Go for it!
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>