[MD] Emptiness & Quantum Mechancics

[MarshaV]

On Oct 12, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> 
> Maybe no more an authority than anyone else that has read ZMM and LILA.  Or
> do claim that your judgements are privileged above others for some reason.
> 
> Andre:
> I used the term 'authority' because you used it. My 'judgements' are based on the
> Annotations in LC (which clarify specific parts of ZMM and LILA), specifically
> annotations 129,130,131,132,133 and 135.
> 
> When you read them carefully there is very little room for 'personal judgements' nor
> 'interpretations' nor 'personal opinions'. They are pretty straightforward comments/
> clarifications/observations/judgements from the man whose MOQ we are discussing here.
> 


Marsha:
Your 'judgements' are based on your 'interpretations' of annotations 129,130,131,132,133 and 135.
It is also your 'opinion' that they are "pretty straightforward comment/clarifications/observations/judgements."  
Your 'opinion' also presumes RMP'S communications skills are absolute and perfect.  I do not believe 
he has claimed such an infallible skill.   

DanG was lucky enough to be able to ask RMP for clarification based on his confusion.  The rest 
of us, with different questions, have not been so fortunate.  So while you may be happy with your 
interpretation of the LC annotations, they may not address questions considered by others.   So 
your posts sound to me mostly condescending gibberish based on illusion.   
 
 
 

 
___