[MD] Emptiness & Quantum Mechancics

[John Carl]

Andre, to answer your basic question:


> Andre:
> I appreciate your frankness but am a bit confused about what you say in the
> above. The MOQ is
> arrived at through radical empiricism. Without an understanding of this it
> would seem, to me,
> extremely difficult to get a grasp on the MOQ,



well I read these two book, you see.  And then thought about them.  Maybe I
don't have a grasp on the MOQ, but I have a grasp on something and I call it
the MoQ...



> and for that matter, those concepts named 'truth'
> (a high quality intellectual pattern) and 'emptiness' or 'nothingness'
> ('There is nothing in the
> sense of no 'thing', that is, 'no object', and the Buddhists use
> nothingness in this way, but the
> term Dynamic is more in keeping within the quotation, 'Within nothingness
> there is a great working'
> from the Zen master,Katagiri Roshi') Anthony's PhD, p 35.
>
>
I've addressed this at some length elsewhere, that I won't repeat now except
to say, just because subjects and objects are empty, doesn't mean everything
is.

Take care,

John