[MD] Emptiness & Quantum Mechancics

[MarshaV]

On Oct 12, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> 
> Your 'judgements' are based on your 'interpretations' of annotations 129,130,131,132,133 and 135.
> It is also your 'opinion' that they are "pretty straightforward comment/clarifications/observations/judgements."
> Your 'opinion' also presumes RMP'S communications skills are absolute and perfect.  I do not believe
> he has claimed such an infallible skill.
> 
> Andre:
> It has little to do with 'infallible skill'. Let alone such platitudes as 'absolute' and 'perfect'. These
> do not exist in the MOQ. It's about a correct understanding of his own metaphysics.
> As dmb remarked before, I think you are being unreasonable, meaning, you cannot be reasoned with because
> you refuse to be reasonable. Rather I think you are behaving like a cantankerous adolescent.
> 
> This makes it very difficult to have a REASONABLE discussion with you and once again I wonder what you
> are hoping to achieve on this Discuss which, after all, is about discussing Mr. Pirsig's MOQ.
> 
> Again, I have not found anything in these annotations that lends itself to endless discussions about
> correct interpretations of them.


 
And?  

For me, the MoQ designates Reality = Quality (unpatterned experienced/patterned experience).  
After that there's plenty of room for discussion.  

I don't see where either you or Dan(Is there a difference?) looking down a LC-nose should affect 
my interests.    They don't.  If you are satisfied with your understanding of annotations 129,130,131,
132,133 and 135, good for you.  

I have repeatedly stated I am interested in considering the MoQ as a bridge between East and 
West.
 
 

Marsha  
 
 
 
___