[MD] Emptiness & Quantum Mechancics

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:56 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Dan Glover wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:39 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 12, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marsha to Andre:
>>>>
>>>> Maybe no more an authority than anyone else that has read ZMM and LILA.  Or
>>>> do claim that your judgements are privileged above others for some reason.
>>>>
>>>> Andre:
>>>> I used the term 'authority' because you used it. My 'judgements' are based on the
>>>> Annotations in LC (which clarify specific parts of ZMM and LILA), specifically
>>>> annotations 129,130,131,132,133 and 135.
>>>>
>>>> When you read them carefully there is very little room for 'personal judgements' nor
>>>> 'interpretations' nor 'personal opinions'. They are pretty straightforward comments/
>>>> clarifications/observations/judgements from the man whose MOQ we are discussing here.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha:
>>> Your 'judgements' are based on your 'interpretations' of annotations 129,130,131,132,133 and 135.
>>> It is also your 'opinion' that they are "pretty straightforward comment/clarifications/observations/judgements."
>>> Your 'opinion' also presumes RMP'S communications skills are absolute and perfect.  I do not believe
>>> he has claimed such an infallible skill.
>>>
>>> DanG was lucky enough to be able to ask RMP for clarification based on his confusion.  The rest
>>> of us, with different questions, have not been so fortunate.  So while you may be happy with your
>>> interpretation of the LC annotations, they may not address questions considered by others.   So
>>> your posts sound to me mostly condescending gibberish based on illusion.
>>
>> Hi Marsha
>>
>> I've always believed that we make our own luck. LILA'S CHILD was a lot
>> of work, especially for someone with my background. I have no formal
>> education to speak of. And the idea for LC wasn't mine to begin
>> with... Bodvar Skutvik talked me into it. But once i started, I saw
>> the value there and put as much time into the project as was
>> practical. Actually, I neglected other areas of my life in order to
>> pursue it so in a sense what I did wasn't practical at all.
>
> Marsha:
> Your great sacrifice and accomplishment has been acknowledge
> many times in this forum.  I have read LC and consulted it many
> times.  Nice job!

Dan:
Sarcasm doesn't become you.

>
>
>>
>> I think Robert Pirsig's annotations are good touching stones to keep
>> in mind when it comes to the MOQ. And yes, another person would have
>> asked different (and most probably) better questions. I asked several
>> people to look over the annotations. But no one seemed to have any
>> ideas at the time. Magnus did send me an email but honestly his
>> comments didn't make sense in the context of the MOQ. They still
>> don't.
>>
>> You may not like Andre's style but so far as I can see, his comments
>> are spot on. I appreciate it when people like Andre, Paul Turner,
>> David Buchanan, Horse, and other thinkers find value in LILA'S CHILD.
>> Thank you all. But as far as me being lucky? No. There is no luck
>> involved. Just plain hard work and persistence.
>
> Marsha:
> You may think Andre's comments are "spot on".  That's your opinion.
> I just don't think that the understanding of the MoQ can end with the LC, not
> Andre's interpretation, and not even your interpretations of the annotations
> as the LC's author.  For all the questions you asked there are many you
> didn't.   Maybe you can concede that much.  And since it's publications maybe
> many new questions have arisen.   I hate to see the MoQ limited by the few
> questions that made it into your book.  I'd like to probe the MoQ deeply, and
> I will not accept that all answers have already be established.

Dan:
I used to enjoy reading your posts, Marsha. No more. All I see is
evasiveness and vindictiveness. If you really want to probe the MOQ
deeply, why are you such a b about it? Don't worry about answering me.
I am done with this discussion.

Thanks for nothing

Dan

>
> Thanks again for hard work and persistence.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>