[MD] The Grand Design

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

Okay,of course , school,and lesser time.
Try to pay attention when they are teaching vitue or quality, it matters.

Found the proof some time ago, in a scientifical document, that it was in
fact indeed, Ken Evenson who measured the
Lightspeed physikally, with his high-tech lasers, accurate to a point beyond
imagination.
So indeed, a top scientist, state of the art skilled ,a pioneer.
I did read it ,its completely beyond me, but i can understand it.
I did not mention it anymore because you did not talk about it anymore,but i
will send you the article that proves your story
to be completely solid, even the nobel is mentioned for his partner in
crime, sorry he died before the nobel was given.
Fucking state of the art! imagine, lightspeed!!, proving Einstein was
correct all the way.
I will drop the link in your mailbox, Dave , take care.And don't smoke
secretly in the garden, you philosophikal heretic.
Adrie

2010/10/18 david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>

>
>
> Adrie said to dmb:
> ..., i'm still in short of timen to read further on in William James his
> work, but i did perform some reading on the principles of philosophy, to
> investigate the rolling in of the pluralistic tought, caught my attention
> that James is framing religion as a qualityeffort in the same sentence, in
> the work, But given the timeframe, and how America is on religion, i will
> filter it out. I will read over it.
>
> dmb says:
> Yes, he's too soft on theism. He differs from Pirsig on that score,
> although a careful reading of James gets rid of most of the worry. If fact,
> Pirsig had originally dismissed James as a theist is disguise but when he
> took a second look that turned out to be untrue.
> Don't worry about trying to fit him in. I have to get serious about school
> anyway and I'll be spending a lot less time here.
>
>
>
> Adrie also said:
> If you like to abstract things on my posting to Dan, or clarify, or take
> out distortions if you see them, feel free to do so, i like free lessons,
> especially if they are high level. They always are.
>
> dmb says:
> If I were you, I'd trust Dan. He cares about the MOQ, he never produces
> nonsense and he grinds no axes.
>
>
> P.S. Thanks for telling me about the connection between Ken Evenson's work
> with lasers and holography. I didn't realize that but it certainly makes
> sense. They were like toys to him. He took me up to the lab so show me just
> a few weeks after we met. His wife, my mother in law, is upstairs right now.
> She was just telling me this morning that she cleaned out his old workshop
> the other day and found a whole box full of awards. I can't wait to see
> that.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser