[MD] The Moral Landscape

[Platt Holden]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ADRIE KINTZIGER" <parser666 at gmail.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 4:56 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] The Moral Landscape


> No , i did not miss the part"direct harm", it is the direct-widget in
> combination with the word harm that i find offensive, Platt
> the indirect impied implication is lethal,and my gratitude towards the
> Liberating Americans, Canadians ans all the
> Allied forces is incredible, pure and without questioning.
> I am gratefull for all the value's given to us, really , especially the
> impact of the Marshall-plan, and the generosity of the
> Americans in general. I am one of those rare people, Platt ,visiting the
> Warcemetery's physikally, to pay them respect.

Platt
Glad to hear of your gratitude to America. But, your statement about
"direct harm" is incomprehensible.

> And Yes , i strongly believe in free speech, and all this right we need.
> I am also aware of the fact that some social corrections are needed, to
> filter out the nature of the beast, the evil within us all.
> Free speech, without violating other people's rights.
>
> The rights we need to have, without abuse of rights, rights can be 
> expoited.

What rights are you talking about. The right not to be offended? Is that 
your
idea of a right?

> And i will treath you correct , Platt, if you leave your cocoon of
> defaitism.

Platt
Another incomprehensible statement.