[MD] e: The Moral Landscape

[Andre Broersen]

  Platt to Andre:

What did you expect to learn?

Andre:
I was hoping to explore with you the possible conditions (or not) under which
the appeal to free speech might be restricted. I am not talking about any Tom, Dick
or Harry or Mary saying what he/she wants. I am talking about person's in 'authority',
persons in representative functions (e.g. politics). Or those situations Arlo brings up
in his latest post.

Are we simply allowed to say what we want?

Is it wise we, at all times and under any circumstance, say what we want?

I am simply questioning the wisdom of, for example, a Wilders and suspect ulterior motives
that have nothing to do with doing justice or even showing respect for this intellectual
pattern of value.

His statements go against at least 3 constitutional rights (also hard fought for...which some
members within his club want to see amended).