[MD] Step One

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Thu Oct 21 20:27:20 PDT 2010


On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:03 PM, 118 wrote:

> Marsha:
> I never stated that the MoQ could be described by neti-neti.  I was saying
> to
> Dan that all this talk it not Quality(Ultimate Truth).
> 
> I do not understand your complaint?
> 
> Mark:
> My complaint was that I do not understand what you are saying.  Could all
> this talk be considered attempts at a metaphysical description of Quality?
> 
> I have not read all of your correspondence with Dan on this subject, so
> perhaps I should not just jump in.  I will try to get full understanding
> before I just take a statement and run with it, so as not to waste your
> time.  I can see you are getting frustrated with my inane questions and I
> beg your forgiveness.   Gracias (as John would say).
> 


Hi Mark,

Sorry, Mark, maybe you are projecting your frustration on to me.   I was 
suggesting to Dan with my words 'not this, not that'  that when all is said 
and done, if I may use an analogy; the words on the menu are not the food.

Please feel free to explain neti-neti to your liking.  


Marsha


___





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list