[MD] Step One
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Thu Oct 21 20:27:20 PDT 2010
On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:03 PM, 118 wrote:
> Marsha:
> I never stated that the MoQ could be described by neti-neti. I was saying
> to
> Dan that all this talk it not Quality(Ultimate Truth).
>
> I do not understand your complaint?
>
> Mark:
> My complaint was that I do not understand what you are saying. Could all
> this talk be considered attempts at a metaphysical description of Quality?
>
> I have not read all of your correspondence with Dan on this subject, so
> perhaps I should not just jump in. I will try to get full understanding
> before I just take a statement and run with it, so as not to waste your
> time. I can see you are getting frustrated with my inane questions and I
> beg your forgiveness. Gracias (as John would say).
>
Hi Mark,
Sorry, Mark, maybe you are projecting your frustration on to me. I was
suggesting to Dan with my words 'not this, not that' that when all is said
and done, if I may use an analogy; the words on the menu are not the food.
Please feel free to explain neti-neti to your liking.
Marsha
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list