[MD] Tea Bagging

plattholden at gmail.com plattholden at gmail.com
Fri Oct 22 18:04:37 PDT 2010


On 23 Oct 2010 at 1:02, Horse wrote:

  For the last 10+ years Platt you've been telling me that socialism and 
communism are the same thing.
So are you now trying to tell us that, in reality, the Nazi's were 
communists?
You've been arguing for years that words don't mean what they mean by 
doing exactly this.
Please explain how the Nazi's were communists.

Socialists, communists, fascists, statists, liberals, progressives and the like 
all seek similar means to the same end -- heaven on earth by government taking 
responsibility for all aspects of life and imposing uniformity of thought and 
action by force. Nazism, like communism et al, is a religion of the state. The 
conflicts between Nazis and communists (and why some think they are different) 
were battles for power, not ultimate goals.

Platt    




Horse

On 23/10/2010 00:01, plattholden at gmail.com wrote:
> Q: What does NAZI stand for?
>
> A. It is short nickname for Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
> (National Socialist German Workers' Party).
>
> Source: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_Nazi_stand_for
>
> Nonsense? I hope you're not going to argue like DMB that words don't mean what
> they mean.
>
>
> On 22 Oct 2010 at 22:21, Horse wrote:
>
>    Nice bit of twisting Plat - complete nonsense though.
> The Nazi's were fascists, not socialists, as you know full well along
> with the Italian and Spanish fascists and the Mosleyite fascists in the UK.
>
> Horse
>
> On 22/10/2010 20:23, Platt Holden wrote:
>> Do you find it suggestive that the socialist party in charge in Germany
>> during WWII was mainly composed of "authoritative personalities"?





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list