[MD] Step One

118 ununoctiums at gmail.com
Sun Oct 24 21:01:00 PDT 2010


Hi Horse,

Thanks for the reminder, and I do consult the archives.  I just sent a
professional response to Dan thanking him for the information.  Perhaps you
could direct me to certain critical subject headings that you feel would
help me out.  I will await your response.

Thanks again,
Mark (member since 2008)

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Horse <horse at darkstar.uk.net> wrote:

>  Mark
>
> As Dan says, you haven't, apparently, been around long enough yet to grasp
> what's going on here and his suggestion that you consult the archives,
> Anthony's work etc. is very apt. What Dan has said is plain good sense and
> is said without being rude unlike your reply.
>
> Cheers
>
> Horse
>
>
>
> On 24/10/2010 15:16, Dan Glover wrote:
>
>> Mark, you obviously have A LOT of catching up to do before we can hold
>> a reasonable discussion. Subject/object metaphysics holds that there
>> are only a subject observing objects. Period. Reading your posts, I
>> don't see that you've grasped that. When you ask: When is it that
>> something enters the SOM realm... something doesn't enter the SOM
>> realm. There isn't "something" out there called SOM. That is the
>> fallacy that Robert Pirsig tried to correct with his Metaphysics of
>> Quality.
>>
>> And for the record, I am not being silly. It is your lack of
>> understanding that makes it seem so. Next thing you'll be calling me a
>> retard, I suppose. Not this, not that has nothing to do with the
>> definition of the intellectual level. Honestly, I am not teacher,
>> Mark. I have very little patience with people who bounce in on their
>> high horse spouting how smart they are. A good scientist would do the
>> research... read the archives for starters... read Anthony McWatt's
>> work... read LILA and ZMM... and if you claim to have read them, read
>> them again. You haven't got the message.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
>
> On 24/10/2010 15:54, 118 wrote:
>
>> [Mark]
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Is that all you've got?  Hmmm...Intellectual indeed.  Is that what you
>> call
>> answers?
>>
>> Well, then, my only response is:  Go back to your master, you effing
>> rottweiler!  You want it your way, there's a nice big bowl of dog food
>> waiting for you under the table, snarf it up, it will make you happy.
>> Stop
>> your pathetic snarling on these airwaves!  Don't come back until you have
>> something productive to bark about!  Go now, shoo,shoo.  That's a good
>> boy.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>
> --
>
> "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
> deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
> — Frank Zappa
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list