[MD] The Dynamics of Value

[Alexander Jarnroth]

Comment:
That's looking from the inside of MoQ, and of course it would be right from
that perspective, as MOQ only considers experience.
If Ham, like me, is trying to consider MoQ in a wider context, as just one
concept among many other concepts, the argument becomes invalid.
But it's true that MoQ just considers experience and that the source then,
of experience, would be experience itself and thus being self-sufficient.
Inside the MoQ, the question concerning an external course would be invalid
in the same way as the statement "This statement is false" would be invalid
in formal logic.

/A

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Andre Broersen
Sent: den 26 oktober 2010 13:32
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] The Dynamics of Value

Once you have invented such 'source', the question starts again; what is the
source of the source (etc etc)? And what you'll end up with is yourself.
Have you ever considered that perhaps there is no such thing as 'complete'
ontology?