[MD] BeTteR-neSs (undefined or otherwise)

[MarshaV]

On Oct 31, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Ham Priday wrote:

> Ham:
> Dan agrees that "'betterness' is relative," which means it is NOT an absolute state of the universe, as some here insist.  However, he denies that the 'observer' has anything to do with it.  In fact, he rejects the very notion of an "independent observer" because, he says, "the 'self' is a fiction."  Like Marsha, he asks: "Where is the self?  Point to it."
> 




Greetings Ham,

I'd like to restate my position.  In my understanding, the self is NOT an independent, inherently existing being who is the center of control.  The individual is a flow of patterns.   One's participation happens through awareness.  


Marsha 

   
___