[MD] Equations for Quality

[118]

>
>
> [Mark]
> For those of you interested in math analogies as applied to Quality, I
> present the following suggestion.
>
> While Quality has no definition, its expression can be one described though
> direction.  Towards betterness.
>
> As such, a vector approach is appropriate.  So I provide the following
> beginning:  Dynamic Quality can be seen as a vector of static quality.
>  This
> is formally written as DQ is equal to SQ with a little arrow over the SQ.
>  Hard to transcribe with the current font system, but some of you may
> understand this.  Further differentiation of the vector is then possible.
>
>
>
> [Andrie]



> nope, if you write this in a mathemathikal model, it needs to be projected
> in all directions,
> it needs to be a spatial model.You cannot limit the properties of quality
> down to
> space dependent vectors.
> Furthermore, Pirsig rejects the notion of a physikal space within the
> moq-model
> (LILA'S CHILD annotations.)
>
> [Mark]
>
Hi Andrie,
Yes, I understand your concern.  The purpose is not to create an equation
that encompasses  Quality per se.  The purpose is to create an equation with
metaphysical implications.

I would explain the equation as follows:  The appearance of things are as
static quality.  That is, dynamic quality expresses itself in temporal
segments that appear static (for a nanosecond or billions of years).  If
indeed the levels do imply evolution, then such static domains represent
direction.  Such direction is a function of dynamic quality.  Please note,
that I am only including SQ and DQ and not Q in the equation.  The vector's
direction is one of value or betterness, and indeed, it is not in a three
dimensional plane or made up of physical coordinates, but metaphysical ones.
 Does this make sense?

Mark


>
>
> 2010/10/31 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > For those of you interested in math analogies as applied to Quality, I
> > present the following suggestion.
> >
> > While Quality has no definition, its expression can be one described
> though
> > direction.  Towards betterness.
> >
> > As such, a vector approach is appropriate.  So I provide the following
> > beginning:  Dynamic Quality can be seen as a vector of static quality.
> >  This
> > is formally written as DQ is equal to SQ with a little arrow over the SQ.
> >  Hard to transcribe with the current font system, but some of you may
> > understand this.  Further differentiation of the vector is then possible.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mark
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>